Official Starfinder RPG Bug Report Thread

[acyd69]

SFRPG ruleset (v2021-6-30) updated within 3 hours of this post. Starfinder Character Operations Manual, Class Vanguard, Special Feature First (and Second) Vanguard Aspect, Vanguard Aspect Cascade, 4th (and 17th) Aspect Embodiment (Ex) has the incorrect description text for the feature. Currently the text for Vanguard Aspect Boundary is duplicated here. The description text from the published manual reads as follows:

Aspect Embodiment (Ex): Once per combat, when you hit multiple creatures in a single round with an attack or attacks (or effects that require an attack roll), you can gain 1 Entropy Point without taking any additional action.

Additionally, within First Vanguard Aspect, the link to Vanguard Aspect Boundary is missing the 'y'.

[madman]

SFRPG ruleset (v2021-6-30) updated within 3 hours of this post. Starfinder Character Operations Manual, Class Vanguard, Special Feature First (and Second) Vanguard Aspect, Vanguard Aspect Cascade, 4th (and 17th) Aspect Embodiment (Ex) has the incorrect description text for the feature. Currently the text for Vanguard Aspect Boundary is duplicated here. The description text from the published manual reads as follows:



Additionally, within First Vanguard Aspect, the link to Vanguard Aspect Boundary is missing the 'y'.

I will get those corrected and the update in the que.
Thanks for reporting these.

Madman..

[acyd69]

Got another one for you Madman! The Vanguard Aspect Insight (Cascade) lists Perception for the insight skill bonus; it should be Acrobatics.

Man I went around and around with this pregen trying to figure out while the skills were off. Glad I was able to find the error.

[Ulric]

Patch Notes for June 29 state [Fixed] Incorporeal effect but when Iam not seeing this effect actual working. Currently all attacks against an Incorporeal NPC do damage. What was fixed?

[superteddy57]

Patch Notes for June 29 state [Fixed] Incorporeal effect but when Iam not seeing this effect actual working. Currently all attacks against an Incorporeal NPC do damage. What was fixed?

In what way is it not working? When posting, more information is provided than it is not working. As to what was fixed, the code ensures that Incorporeal NPCs are immune to critical damage, halves damage from energy and magic sources, full damage from force sources, and ignores kinetic sources.

[Ulric]

In what way is it not working? When posting, more information is provided than it is not working. As to what was fixed, the code ensures that Incorporeal NPCs are immune to critical damage, halves damage from energy and magic sources, full damage from force sources, and ignores kinetic sources.

Hey supperteddy57, the second sentence of my post said "In what way is it not working". I will do some additional testing.

[Evolivolution]

From what I can tell Incorporeal works as intended.
Maybe you could write me a message on discord!?

[superteddy57]

Hey supperteddy57, the second sentence of my post said "In what way is it not working". I will do some additional testing.

Again, I must ask for more information. As I need to know how you have combat set up. The situation, the weapon being used, the attacker traits, the defender traits. Have you tracked the damage to the NPC? I've tested it and I'm not seeing the damage being applied. As you can see, what you provided "Currently all attacks against an Incorporeal NPC do damage." is not correct with my testing. So to ensure my testing fits with your scenario, I will need more information.

[Ulric]

Again, I must ask for more information. As I need to know how you have combat set up. The situation, the weapon being used, the attacker traits, the defender traits. Have you tracked the damage to the NPC? I've tested it and I'm not seeing the damage being applied. As you can see, what you provided "Currently all attacks against an Incorporeal NPC do damage." is not correct with my testing. So to ensure my testing fits with your scenario, I will need more information.

I was just asking a simple question, so I could do a little more testing before I reported something that wasn't really a bug. I know what you want to know when we are reporting a real problem. You've been doing a fantastic job fixing ruleset and I don't want waste your time investigating a bug that doesn't exist. If I was sure i had found a bug I would have provided a proper bug report.

[superteddy57]

I was just asking a simple question, so I could do a little more testing before I reported something that wasn't really a bug. I know what you want to know when we are reporting a real problem. You've been doing a fantastic job fixing ruleset and I don't want waste your time investigating a bug that doesn't exist. If I was sure i had found a bug I would have provided a proper bug report.

Awesome. Thank you. The way it was phrased it sounded like you saw an issue. Thank you for providing the feedback and reports!