Thread: Better Combat Effects
-
November 19th, 2021, 20:07 #231
4E: BCE v2.13
I am still getting the s'Noope' in the chat box when rolling damage.
-
November 19th, 2021, 20:21 #232
-
November 19th, 2021, 20:38 #233High Templar
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Posts
- 174
Tested in a campaign with no other extensions, it looks like something in BCE is causing the Damage Threshold (DT: X) effect to not work. When rolling damage against someone with it on it returns an error.
-
November 19th, 2021, 21:13 #234
-
November 19th, 2021, 21:56 #235High Templar
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Posts
- 174
That fixed it. Thank you!
-
November 19th, 2021, 22:20 #236Acolyte
- Join Date
- May 2019
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Posts
- 1
PFRPG: BCE 2.14
Tested in a new campaign with no other extensions, it looks like something in BCE is causing long rests to not work. No error is given. No hitpoints are restored and no abilities are reset.
-
November 20th, 2021, 01:48 #237
-
November 21st, 2021, 17:07 #238Patriarch
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Location
- Bergen
- Posts
- 327
I play pathfinder.
I have an effect that I activate 1/round that gives me 3 extra AC against one melee attack. I can manually activate this as an effect every round and is like:
Shoulder roll; AC: 3, melee (expend on next roll)
If there was a way to deactivate this effect on the next roll instead of removing it I could activate it on the start of each of my turns automatically with this extension like this I think:
Shoulder roll; AC: 3, melee (expend on next roll); TURNAS
So are there any way to do this? Or include it in this extension? It is only a small quality of life thing for me, but I have 3 of these I need to activate each round. It would be nice to not forget to activate one of these
-
November 21st, 2021, 17:41 #239
There isn't a way with PF to do this when a target is attacked. You can do it however if the target takes damage with DMGDT. Shoulder roll; AC: 3, melee (expend on next roll); TURNAS; DMGDT
I did do what I think what you are looking for with ATKDS for the 4E rule set. I didn't think there was a use case to expand that to other rule sets but I can look into implementing ATKDS for 3.5E
-
November 22nd, 2021, 05:10 #240Warrior-Priest
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 46
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Reply With Quote


Bookmarks