DICE PACKS BUNDLE
Page 39 of 132 First ... 29 37 38 39 40 41 49 89 ... Last
  1. #381

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    East Coast USA.
    Posts
    961
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnimost View Post
    I said I'm just throwing numbers up in the air. And I don't appreciate what you are implying about me and my group.
    I'm sorry. I got you and your group confused with that *other* random internet person and group over there. The message was directed at them, not you and your noble group of paladins.

    That being said, your original message mentioned very large numbers, and if you don't think that there are folks out there would try to abuse the system ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnimost View Post
    ... Besides, people who would go to such lengths to avoid paying would get a cracked copy anyway, so the lost revenue is probably close to zero.
    I don't think it is a good business model to live in fear of the hackerz.

    I want SW to continue to make their awesome product. I want them to sink their revenue into making it better for me and my group, not giving huge discounts to others.

  2. #382
    Zacchaeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    22,626
    So, let’s keep it friendly please.
    If there is something that you would like to see in Fantasy Grounds that isn't currently part of the software or if there is something you think would improve a ruleset then add your idea here https://www.fantasygrounds.com/featu...rerequests.php

  3. #383
    LordEntrails's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    -7 UTC
    Posts
    18,965
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnimost View Post
    A license that covers up to X players with the same license key. Everyone using that license key could be a GM or a player, one GM at a time but that could be anyone holding that key. Should be very straightforward to implement, as that's how many corporate software licenses work so I imagine the tech is fairly robust. Probably requires FG to phone home, though.

    Pricing could be compared to FGU Standard $35 per player with a discount as otherwise it wouldn't make sense, so perhaps $25 or $30 per license. Or if that's too confusing, have group size tiers, e.g. up to six players for $180, up to ten for $275 and up to fifteen players $375, perhaps even bigger one for those who host online games with random groups. Just throwing numbers up in the air here.
    Except wouldn't it be MORE functional than a Standard license? So then it should cost more, not less.

    Second, the phone home part would be necessary, unless SW used something like FlexNet so each user or group could install their own license server. Licensing FlexNet or other license management software like that is expensive, and would easily increase the cost of each FGU user/group license by a few hundred dollars. So that woudn't work. (And FlexNet is one of those big license management software companies that all those business applications use to management concurrent licensing that you referred to.)
    Not everyone has money to forgo four mickey dee meals for a luxury that is RPGs. Real-life friendships are more important to me than financial grandstanding. Just sayin...
    Absolutely.

    And again, I think SW would be open to something that actually worked as a business model. But works for your use case may not work for them. Hence the points I asked originally. It has to be no more challenging, resource intensive or expensive to manage than their current system. It s needs to be just as secure. And it needs to be on par with the financial incentive (i.e. profitable) for them so they can make a fair wage and continue to grow and take the financial risks that they have and receive reasonable returns.

    As for bulk or group licensing, Steam also has the 4 for the price of 3 deal. And unless SW were to build a new automated system for buying ana managing bulk licensings (i.e. a investment in capital) the break even point for bulk licenses is probably upwards of 10 or 12. (i.e. the over head with dealing with special cases actually makes them more expensive, not less).

    But, we are pretty far OT and maybe should move this into a thread of its own.

    Problems? See; How to Report Issues, Bugs & Problems
    On Licensing & Distributing Community Content
    Community Contributions: Gemstones, 5E Quick Ref Decal, Adventure Module Creation, Dungeon Trinkets, Balance Disturbed, Dungeon Room Descriptions
    Note, I am not a SmiteWorks employee or representative, I'm just a user like you.

  4. #384
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEntrails View Post
    Except wouldn't it be MORE functional than a Standard license? So then it should cost more, not less.
    Not as I understand it. With everyone having a Standard license anyone can be a GM AFAICT, exactly like with a group discount. Essentially the group license would be a discount on the Standard license. A bulk discount as someone else pointed out, which is very common. A way to encourage groups to migrate to or pick up FG.

    Quote Originally Posted by LordEntrails View Post
    Second, the phone home part would be necessary, unless SW used something like FlexNet so each user or group could install their own license server. Licensing FlexNet or other license management software like that is expensive, and would easily increase the cost of each FGU user/group license by a few hundred dollars. So that woudn't work. (And FlexNet is one of those big license management software companies that all those business applications use to management concurrent licensing that you referred to.)
    That sounds like a corporate solution, there's nothing cheaper for SMBs?

    Quote Originally Posted by LordEntrails View Post
    And again, I think SW would be open to something that actually worked as a business model. But works for your use case may not work for them. Hence the points I asked originally. It has to be no more challenging, resource intensive or expensive to manage than their current system. It s needs to be just as secure. And it needs to be on par with the financial incentive (i.e. profitable) for them so they can make a fair wage and continue to grow and take the financial risks that they have and receive reasonable returns.
    I know the financial and profitability side well, I do that for a living.


    Is a subscription model being looked at for FGU? Perhaps one that would count towards buying a Standard license? Say, $5 per month, and after 10 months you'd get a Standard license? That way people who just don't have or won't pay $35 could dip their toes in, and get a Standard license if they like the product enough and stick with it. Require enough months so you essentially get interest from these customers.
    Last edited by Magnimost; April 27th, 2019 at 19:25.

  5. #385
    LordEntrails's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    -7 UTC
    Posts
    18,965
    Blog Entries
    9
    Subscriptions will be available for FGU v1, not beta version. Standard subscription is $4/ month and does not count towards a one time license (has been asked before)

    Problems? See; How to Report Issues, Bugs & Problems
    On Licensing & Distributing Community Content
    Community Contributions: Gemstones, 5E Quick Ref Decal, Adventure Module Creation, Dungeon Trinkets, Balance Disturbed, Dungeon Room Descriptions
    Note, I am not a SmiteWorks employee or representative, I'm just a user like you.

  6. #386
    I am very, very disappointed that multi-monitor support isn't going to be a thing. It's been top of the wishlist for a very long time, and screen space is one of the biggest annoyances in FG. Just the ability to put the map in another window would make a world of difference.

    What's stopping this from happening?

  7. #387
    Quote Originally Posted by The High Druid View Post
    I am very, very disappointed that multi-monitor support isn't going to be a thing. It's been top of the wishlist for a very long time, and screen space is one of the biggest annoyances in FG. Just the ability to put the map in another window would make a world of difference.

    What's stopping this from happening?
    Probably the small portion of users who have multi-monitor setups. Not sure if there are statistics (Steam hardware survey?), but I imagine it being in the single percentage digits.

  8. #388
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnimost View Post
    Probably the small portion of users who have multi-monitor setups. Not sure if there are statistics (Steam hardware survey?), but I imagine it being in the single percentage digits.
    I find that very hard to believe. I'm in three games, I only know of one player that doesn't have access to at least 2 screens.

  9. #389
    damned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    24,754
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by The High Druid View Post
    I am very, very disappointed that multi-monitor support isn't going to be a thing. It's been top of the wishlist for a very long time, and screen space is one of the biggest annoyances in FG. Just the ability to put the map in another window would make a world of difference.

    What's stopping this from happening?
    There is no robust cross platform multi monitor support in Unity.
    There are multi monitor libraries available but they do not have the required cross platform support.

    Quote Originally Posted by The High Druid View Post
    I find that very hard to believe. I'm in three games, I only know of one player that doesn't have access to at least 2 screens.
    I use two screens on my computer when GMing and playing. But I only use one for FG. I have always only used one for FG.
    I usually have open Chat and Combat and the current Map as background.
    Everything else I open, use, and then close.
    I use the shortcut bar and pins on maps to keep anything important close by.
    Im not saying multi-monitor support wouldnt be useful - Im just saying that even having access to 2 screens I personally dont use or need them for FG.

  10. #390
    Patou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    South-shore of Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    555
    So... who's excited for Wednesday? Real anxious here! Trying to remember if Doug had said most pre-existing 5E modules were updated (new features)....or will be during and up to the December official release

    Too early....need coffee
    Patou a.k.a: Patmaster
    Challenging players since 1987
    2E, 3.5E & now 5E
    https://twitter.com/PatouLeFou
    Discord = @PatouLeFou

Page 39 of 132 First ... 29 37 38 39 40 41 49 89 ... Last

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Starfinder Playlist

Log in

Log in