Thread: Test Release v3.1.3
-
October 20th, 2015, 15:34 #71
-
October 20th, 2015, 15:38 #72FG Wiki: How to Compile the FG Logs
Private Messages: My inbox is forever filling up with PMs. Please don't send me PMs unless they are actually private/personal messages. General FG questions should be asked in the forums - don't be afraid, the FG community don't bite and you're giving everyone the chance to respond and learn!
-
October 20th, 2015, 18:56 #73Grand Patriarch
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Vendsyssel (Denmark)
- Posts
- 881
So this will remove anything from the campaign interfering with the module?
Vires Animi
-
October 20th, 2015, 19:16 #74FG Wiki: How to Compile the FG Logs
Private Messages: My inbox is forever filling up with PMs. Please don't send me PMs unless they are actually private/personal messages. General FG questions should be asked in the forums - don't be afraid, the FG community don't bite and you're giving everyone the chance to respond and learn!
-
October 20th, 2015, 19:22 #75Grand Patriarch
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Vendsyssel (Denmark)
- Posts
- 881
I've never noticed that option. Note to self: Just ask Trenloe for help! Thanks a lot!
Vires Animi
-
October 20th, 2015, 20:23 #76SmiteWorks
Supreme Deity
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 23,362
There was a change in v3.1.0 that saved local campaign module edits, even when the underlying module data changes. This allows modules to be updated without removing local campaign changes.
However, if the overall data structure of the module changes, then you will get empty records like you are seeing. Using the Revert option will avoid this. There is no good mechanism to determine whether the module changes will affect the data in a way that requires automatic reversion.
In a related scenario, you can mark the module data as "static" which means that the data can't be changed within a campaign, and you won't have to worry about this. We use this flag for reference material in our modules.
Regards,
JPG
-
October 20th, 2015, 23:36 #77SmiteWorks
Supreme Deity
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 23,362
Updates
- [CoreRPG+] Dice expressions and table multipliers can be combined. (Ex: [1d6x] [<table name>])
- [5E] Updates across most data modules for errata and data issue reports.
- [CoreRPG+] Addressed some performance issues related to graphic frame sizes in rulesets.
- [5E/PFRPG/3.5E] Some effects working incorrectly when the specifiers were separated by spaces. Fixed.
- [5E] Script error when parsing spells with concentration in duration field. Fixed.
- [5E] Dice tower was not movable. Fixed.
Cheers,
JPGLast edited by Moon Wizard; October 21st, 2015 at 01:21.
-
October 21st, 2015, 00:20 #78
Are we going to get the dice tower fixed for 5E in this release so that it can be movable?
-
October 21st, 2015, 00:57 #79SmiteWorks
Supreme Deity
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 23,362
Done.
JPG
-
October 21st, 2015, 01:07 #80
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks