-
March 12th, 2022, 01:30 #1
Demoralize Opponent - Intimidation check - how to code / if possible?
Hi fellas
Is there a way to "code" as an effect the Demoralize Opponent use of the Intimidation skill? My Rogue now has Dazzling Display and wanna use it. So far the opponents have to roll individual saves and I have to manually check. Is there a way to automate it kind of like a spell?
-
March 12th, 2022, 04:21 #2My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
March 12th, 2022, 17:21 #3
Assuming you are talking about Pathfinder 1E, opponents don't get a save against intimidation. It's calculated as a simple DC check for the person performing the intimidation. https://www.d20pfsrd.com/skills/intimidate
"The DC of this check is equal to 10 + the target’s Hit Dice + the target’s Wisdom modifier."
Granted, that doesn't help you if there isn't automation available regarding performing skill checks, but I just wanted to point out to my understanding of 1E rules, there is no opponent saving throw for intimidation. (Either that or I've been playing my Enforcer Monk wrong all this this time.)
Cheers,
BrianLast edited by MostTornBrain; March 12th, 2022 at 17:24.
-
March 12th, 2022, 18:05 #4
-
March 13th, 2022, 05:24 #5
Actually, I am looking at that I have here and there some small things already achieved, but nothing major; it is difficult to find time for it due to my profession, but in some sense I am doing it. I will release it in five years or so, lol
(The background of that is that I am using a homebrew system, Tome of Prowess, which heavily changes the skill system; so, already for my own campaign I need to write scripts for the skill stuff. Hence, the sooner I can finally run my campaign, the sooner I can also look at such things )My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
March 13th, 2022, 23:57 #6
Yep, PF1ed. I'm familiar with how the intimidate check works so your Enforcer Monk is all good, ha ha. Would be a nifty thing with an extension to help out. It's no biggie manually doing it, but if it was automated in some way it would be .. dare I say it... "elegant".
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks