View Poll Results: Which additional product lines would you support with purchases?
- Voters
- 384. You may not vote on this poll
Multiple Choice Poll.
-
October 20th, 2020, 10:36 #21
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oulu, Finland
- Posts
- 287
Not terribly interested in settings or materials for use with older editions, but being able to use Spelljammer, Planescape, Dark Sun (in that order) setting material (images, story entries etc.) inside a 5E game, without messing with extensions, or with a smiteworks-supported extension would be useful. I wouldn't want to risk buying them on the strength of a community extension that might disappear.
-
October 20th, 2020, 11:00 #22
-
October 20th, 2020, 13:15 #23
OK I have to ask. What is the big draw of being able to play the Basic or Advanced box sets rules? It just seems limiting to me but I bet I am missing the correct point of view to understand. I left the box sets as soon as I could get the Advanced D&D books.
I can see the draw to the old original Chainmail and all so I feel I just need to be enlightened.If you want a Wishlist in the Fantasy grounds store klick the link and upvote it.
https://fgapp.idea.informer.com/proj/fgapp?ia=135468
-
October 20th, 2020, 14:00 #24
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
- Posts
- 18
4e support would be amazing. It never really got it's full chance inside a well-supported VTT environment and it's sooo much better with even a modicum of computer aid as-is. 4e is where I'd put my vote, definitely.
3.5? Far less interested since my groups would lean into PF1 if we were ever headed back in that direction again, but I don't see that happening any time in the next decade, literally.
-
October 20th, 2020, 14:16 #25My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
October 20th, 2020, 14:55 #26
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
- Posts
- 18
While true, the groups I've played and run PF for never really used 3.5 modules or sourcebooks outside of the Book of Vile Darkness, at least that I can recall. This is across six different multi-year campaigns. That might be a testament to the amount of content PF1 has available for its audience, or at least for a stronger preference for Paizo's materials.
Undoubtedly there are groups who mix the 3.5 and PF stuff much more often, though.
-
October 20th, 2020, 22:00 #27
Savage Worlds RIFTS.
Iron Kingdoms RPG.
Would have been my first and first.5 choice.
But I settled for 4e and dark sun. 🤷*♂️
-
October 20th, 2020, 23:16 #28
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 1,564
My thinking would be simple, easy, quick and streamlined. There was a simplicity to the BECMI rules that old schoolers sometimes miss.
As for BECMI my vote would be to convert the D&D Cyclopedia. That has all of it in one place (Immortal rules excepted, but that should be separated anyways).
-
October 20th, 2020, 23:19 #29
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 1,564
-
October 21st, 2020, 04:07 #30
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks