Thread: SmiteWorks OGL 1.2 Discussion
-
January 23rd, 2023, 01:00 #61
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Eastern (-4 UTC)
- Posts
- 100
Thank you for some insight into your operations and your arrangement with WotC. It really wouldn't make much sense if they severed ties (contract) with FG (or Roll20) for that matter. TBH, I'm glad I joined FG b/c I feel more secure with my purchases given FG's license with WotC that allows use of already-purchased content.
I'm intrigued if they've reached out with a new version of your licensing agreement - b/c the sense I get from OGL 1.2 is they're trying to stifle VTT innovation at a certain point (animation, more like video games). Plus, several publishers are jumping aboard Open RPG (referring to ORC and Pinnacle is developing their own creator universe IIRC). I would think FG should be open to all publishers?
-
January 23rd, 2023, 01:35 #62
We signed on to support ORC as well. We have always tried to be a platform that supports all games.
-
January 23rd, 2023, 04:42 #63
Standard "not a lawyer, so take this opinion as, well, an opinion" disclaimer...
I share the same concerns voiced repeatedly about WOTC putting itself in the position of subjective decider whether content is hateful, obscene, etc. In my opinion, WOTC's current language is a complete non-starter, but wanting to be able to protect their brand image isn't an unreasonable position on it's face. If WOTC won't strike this section, then I agree that Doug's proposed solution of making badges or similar kinds of "WOTC approved" markings issuable/revocable at WOTC's discretion is a reasonable way for WOTC to protect their brand/image and it should largely address the community's censorship concern. That could include WOTC instituting a formal submission/review process (possibly even monetized) in order for creators to receive permission to include formal "WOTC approved/endorsed/ect." badges or markings indicating content is compliant with WOTC's stated community standards. Again, this would just be to receive some kind of voluntarily sought out WOTC badge/endorsement - not something that would be required to release 3rd party content. As long as it is optional for those who could care less about WOTC's stamp of approval, then I'd be ok with it - a WOTC badge is not something that would sway me when making a purchase but I could see some publishers attaching value to it. Where I would draw the line is restricting language or markings indicating that the included content is "5e/5x/6x Compatible" - system compatibility should not be reasonably taken as any kind of endorsement of content.
I'm not particularly a fan of the idea, but would also consider a compromise to require that 3rd party content include language that their content has not been reviewed, approved, or anyway endorsed by WOTC - depending on the specific language, of course. Would much rather see a process that interested content creators seek out a voluntary badge etc. as opposed to forcing all to include mandatory legalese language but a standard disclaimer doesn't seem overly onerous.
Would prefer to see this section completely tossed out but if some combination of WOTC approved badging and/or disclaimer isn't enough for them, then yup - it sure does look like WOTC is more interested in the ability to censor potential competitors, as opposed to just trying to protect their brand...
-
January 23rd, 2023, 12:48 #64
- Join Date
- Mar 2020
- Location
- Wales, UK
- Posts
- 309
SmiteWorks broad support of a range of games, not just in terms of character sheet/rulesets but also in terms of actual full rulebooks with all data entered, plus adventures and supplements for lots of different game systems, is very much appreciated. I'm very grateful not just to the developer team but also to the community developers who work very hard of getting this stuff all available and released on the store. It goes a long way towards encouraging take-up of these other games to have the leg-work done already!
-
January 23rd, 2023, 15:58 #65
(As I've said earlier, 6f is a non starter for me as written, but..)
Folks should know that WotC is currently engaged with TSR LLC / aka TSR Hobbies / aka NuTSR in a lawsuit that in part is about preventing hateful speech. So it's understandable to some degree that they would want to prevent having to take legal action against a company to protect their branding. There is a great deal more to the issue than hateful speech, but that is one aspect that is specifically listed in the legal case.
To me, 6f is a knee jerk reaction to that, but is poorly thought out and even more poorly written.
Problems? See; How to Report Issues, Bugs & Problems
On Licensing & Distributing Community Content
Community Contributions: Gemstones, 5E Quick Ref Decal, Adventure Module Creation, Dungeon Trinkets, Balance Disturbed, Dungeon Room Descriptions
Note, I am not a SmiteWorks employee or representative, I'm just a user like you.
-
January 23rd, 2023, 16:37 #66
Lesser Deity
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Arkansas
- Posts
- 7,398
That was my impression as well - WotC with a poorly thought out knee jerk reaction - maybe after being prodded by Hasbro over the lawsuit.
-
January 23rd, 2023, 17:42 #67
No, that lawsuit is about trademarks. That Justin Lanasa is (IMO from all his posts online) a horrible person is tangential to the case.
Paul Grosse
PCGen BoD
PR Silverback
Autobackup Batch file, Always ALWAYS backup your data. Remember to follow the 3-2-1 rule!
-
January 23rd, 2023, 17:57 #68
Problems? See; How to Report Issues, Bugs & Problems
On Licensing & Distributing Community Content
Community Contributions: Gemstones, 5E Quick Ref Decal, Adventure Module Creation, Dungeon Trinkets, Balance Disturbed, Dungeon Room Descriptions
Note, I am not a SmiteWorks employee or representative, I'm just a user like you.
-
January 23rd, 2023, 22:01 #69
Dear members of the Fantasy Grounds community,
We understand that there has been a lot of discussion and concern recently about the Open Game License (OGL) and its potential impact on the RPG community. We want to assure you that the Fantasy Grounds Academy is not affiliated with Wizards of the Coast or even directly affiliated with Smiteworks LLC, and our primary focus is on providing support, education, inspiration, and a positive community for users of the Fantasy Grounds Unity platform.
While it is true that many of the FG users enjoy using the platform for playing Dungeons and Dragons, there are also many other rulesets and games that can be played on Fantasy Grounds Unity. We encourage you and others to also explore these options and consider branching out into other games, such as Shadow of the Demon Lord, Alien, or Pathfinder 2e. There are so many exciting and diverse games available on the FGU platform, and we want to hopefully inspire and help empower you to discover new systems and experiences. Additionally, there are many licensed adventures and other content available through Smiteworks that can be used on the platform, regardless of the status of the OGL.
It is important to remember that the Fantasy Grounds Unity platform and our community of users, volunteers and GMs that surrounds it are bigger than any one game or ruleset. We are here to support and help each other, no matter what changes or challenges may come our way. Let's continue to be a positive and supportive community, and stay focused on what we can control: our own enjoyment of the platform and our efforts to help others learn and use it effectively.
No matter what changes or challenges come our way, we have each other and the incredible resources of the Fantasy Grounds Unity platform to help us navigate them. Let's continue to be a positive and supportive community, and to inspire and empower each other to make the most of the platform and all it has to offer.
Sincerely,
FG Academy CommunityFGA Founder
FGU teacher and student!
Ultimate License Holder
Discord Alias: Laerun#6969
https://www.fantasygroundsacademy.com
-
January 27th, 2023, 20:31 #70
New official info from WOTC. https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1439...eative-commons
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks