Rappan Athuk for 5e

[LordEntrails]

I would second Trenloe's concern. As a user I would expect that a module that opens in a ruleset (without an extension being required) fully work in that ruleset.

The UME has big bold caveats and warnings about that and is a step the GM has to explicitly do to get it to work and so GMs who use it shouldn't be surprised.

I fear you are going to run into users who are surprised or complain that it doesn't work (i.e. they get errors, NPC are not complete, etc) in a ruleset that it opens in. And you will spend unnecessary time supporting/answering those questions.

[Jesse0317]

I would second Trenloe's concern. As a user I would expect that a module that opens in a ruleset (without an extension being required) fully work in that ruleset.

The UME has big bold caveats and warnings about that and is a step the GM has to explicitly do to get it to work and so GMs who use it shouldn't be surprised.

I fear you are going to run into users who are surprised or complain that it doesn't work (i.e. they get errors, NPC are not complete, etc) in a ruleset that it opens in. And you will spend unnecessary time supporting/answering those questions.

Duly noted:

I'll revert it back to 5th edition only, pending what Smiteworks says.

[Trenloe]

Duly noted:

I'll revert it back to 5th edition only, pending what Smiteworks says.

Thanks!

[ddavison]

Yes, the module should work without errors in any ruleset it lists as being supported. GMs who decide to run it with something like the Universal Module extension are choosing to accept that some things may not work.

[Zacchaeus]

I totally missed this thread so I reported some issues here https://www.fantasygrounds.com/forum...n-Athuk-Issues