Thread: MoreCore Ruleset
-
February 20th, 2018, 20:23 #681
Great, thanks for the quick reply. Wasn't sure if that change was intentional or not. If it was, my bad, if not glad you know. You guys are awesome, and doing a GREAT JOB!
-
February 21st, 2018, 01:28 #682
-
February 21st, 2018, 01:33 #683Private Messages: My inbox is forever filling up with PMs. Please don't send me PMs unless they are actually private/personal messages. General FG questions should be asked in the forums - don't be afraid, the FG community don't bite and you're giving everyone the chance to respond and learn!
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:52 #684
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- France (Gard)
- Posts
- 44
Re-post
Aventure French rpg
a simple rules system
Roll 1d100 % <= attribute + bonus skill to Success
01 a 05 - Critical success
96 - 00 - Critical failure
Attribute : 5 - 99 % max
Bonus skill : 5 - 50 %
GM can add a bonus or penalty (5 % a 50 % or +)
How to program dice in morecore
-
February 21st, 2018, 12:21 #685
Hola meguido please have a look at the script for talislanta rolls and make a copy and have a go at modifying it...
Have a look at the files listed on this post: https://www.fantasygrounds.com/forum...l=1#post373047
Give it a go... if you cant get it Ill have a go.
But please - if you are going to post requests for rollers look at all the other posts and see what extra questions I ask... and provide all the info...
-
February 21st, 2018, 14:17 #686
And in depth info on FG actions (dice rolling) here: https://www.fantasygrounds.com/forum...(dice-rolling)
Private Messages: My inbox is forever filling up with PMs. Please don't send me PMs unless they are actually private/personal messages. General FG questions should be asked in the forums - don't be afraid, the FG community don't bite and you're giving everyone the chance to respond and learn!
-
February 21st, 2018, 15:19 #687
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- France (Gard)
- Posts
- 44
Hola damned
i recovered Script for talistanta rolls but :
if nTotal <= 05 then
rMessage.text = rMessage.text .. "\n[Critical Success]"; ------ ok
elseif nTotal <= ? then
rMessage.text = rMessage.text .. "\n[Success]";
? compare Dice result (1d100%) to Attribute+bonus skill or Attribute alone and Dice result <= : Success , what function to run ?
elseif nTotal > ? then
rMessage.text = rMessage.text .. "\n[Failure]";
? compare Dice result (1d100%) to Attribute+bonus skill or Attribute alone and Dice result > : Failure , what function to run ?
elseif nTotal >= 96 ? then
rMessage.text = rMessage.text .. "\n[Critical Failure]";
end
? compare Dice result (1d100%) to Attribute+bonus skill or Attribute alone and Dice result >= 96 : Critical failure , what function to run ?
help me...
-
February 21st, 2018, 22:10 #688
If you look at the roll description you will see their is a different result for 0-5 and 6-10 etc you dont need both - you need 1-5 and 96-100 so work on those.
You also have to look at the logic behind the order in which you test for values. In this case it should be easy...
if <= 5
else if >= 96
else
? compare Dice result (1d100%) to Attribute+bonus skill or Attribute alone and Dice result <= : Success , what function to run ?
elseif nTotal > ? then
rMessage.text = rMessage.text .. "\n[Failure]";
? compare Dice result (1d100%) to Attribute+bonus skill or Attribute alone and Dice result > : Failure , what function to run ?
elseif nTotal >= 96 ? then
rMessage.text = rMessage.text .. "\n[Critical Failure]";
end
? compare Dice result (1d100%) to Attribute+bonus skill or Attribute alone and Dice result >= 96 : Critical failure , what function to run ?
help me...
-
February 22nd, 2018, 08:26 #689
Ok so I went to grab the examples to send you only realize I had deleted the temp campaign I created them in. So I tried to recreate the issue and it worked as advertised this time. So either I hit an infrequent bug or, more likely, I screwed up somehow when I did it the first time and it would have worked correctly the first time had I done properly.
-
February 22nd, 2018, 08:43 #690
Hah. Good news. Bad news. The other good news is its always quicker entering things the second time. If you send me your export data we might be able to salvage some/all too.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks