Thread: Correct Sickened condition
-
July 6th, 2014, 22:40 #1Saint
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Sammamish, WA
- Posts
- 1,564
Correct Sickened condition
In our session today, my poor Druid drank something that gave him the sickened condition. My wonderful GM put the following effect on me: "Sickened; ATK: -2; SKILL: -2; SAVE: -2; ABIL: -2". After this, we were seeing -4 to everything instead of -2. During the game we were theorizing that it was double dipping due to both ATK: -2 and ABIL: -2, but now I think the real reason is because Sickened is a built-in condition in the 3.5E/PF ruleset, so the correct effect should have just been "Sickened", is that correct?
-
July 6th, 2014, 22:44 #2Grand Templar
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Umeå, Sweden, GMT +2
- Posts
- 297
Yes, I am fairly sure that most of the conditions are pre programmed in the Pathfinder and 3.5 rulesets, that is probably why it was applied double.
/H
We don't stop playing because we grow old,
we grow old because we stop playing!
Now running the first installment of Horizons of the Vast, a Starfinder Campaign, and Kingmaker 2nd ed.
-
July 6th, 2014, 22:44 #3Saint
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Bristol, UK
- Posts
- 1,208
That is, indeed, correct! You can see all the conditions listed here:
https://www.fantasygrounds.com/wiki/...cts#ConditionsLast edited by Callum; July 6th, 2014 at 22:47.
Reply With Quote
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks