The weekly updates are pushed on Tuesday of every week.
Printable View
The weekly updates are pushed on Tuesday of every week.
The premade 'nonleathal' modifier in the modifier box doesn't work when players roll with it.
Attachment 47530 first attack was made by my player with the nonleathal modifier, second one was made by me. Everything else was exactly the same.
I just tested again the expansion bays : Now the maneuvrability decrease by one step every time you add an external bay. The correct formula is a decrease for every set of 3 bays (rounded up) : -1 for 1,2 or 3 bays, -2 for 4,5 or 6 etc.
Thank you for the clarification. I see where it went wrong. I will push another update with the weekly update.Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlerogue
I apologize if this is in the wrong thread.
The starship Hippocampus from the Deadsuns AP Book #1 does not seem to have the correct stat block working for it.
The ship seems to be missing any thrusters. The shields do not populate and the weapons do not work.
Am I doing anything wrong? Other starships from that book populate just fine.
Thanks,
Rhoh
The formula now work for the turning speed calculation ! :)
... except when you try to remove some external expansion bay :p : i have a base turning distance of +1, corresponding to a good maneuvrability. When i add some EEB, everything works fine : Average (+2) with 1-3 EEB, Poor (+3) with 4-6, Clumsy (+4) with 5-8. But when you try to remove a surnumeral EEB (for example you have a number of EEB of 4 and you want to switch to 3) the turning distance decrease correctly but the maneuvrability switch to good whatever the turning distance (That's a minor issue though).
Also you can't have more EEB that the base number of expansion bay provided by your frame, and EEB can't be set on ships smaller than Small.
Thank for your work !
Nope, you have the right thread. Welcome to the forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by rhohb0tt
I think this is a little bit of all of us...
1) Thrusters missing
I missed that apparently. I will add and get it updated.
2) Shields do not work
I am going to punt this to superteddy57. I have noticed that when shields are first added, it populates the tactical but later disappears from tactical. I am finding this issue with other ships, not just this one. You can manually update the shields using the starship combat tracker but I would assume that the shields would default to fully balanced unless otherwise indicated (just like when the shields were first added to the sheet).
3) Weapons do not work
This might be you? Not sure how you are doing it and I'll admit I haven't played Starfinder for months, but I added the PC Ship to the party sheet, put a PC attached as gunner to the ship and was able to fire the weapons and deal damage from the gunner's character sheet.
The maneuvrability issue was related to the ship constantly pulling the base maneuvrability from the frame, apologies. It will now update with the turning. As for the number allowed and the ability to add them to smaller ships, I wanted the GM to be able to homebrew if they wished. Setting up gate keepers was an issue with the PC ship sheet in earlier iterations. I do not know how you wish to play and try to accomdate many playstyles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlerogue
Thanks for the report. The shields issue was ruleset related. I will be providing an update to fix this. You might need to set the shields manually when it first loads, but should retain them moving forward after the update. As for the weapons not working, PC and NPC ships now need to select a firing arc when attempting an attack. Can you check to see that this might be the issue?Quote:
Originally Posted by rhohb0tt
Yup, maybe just setting up a chat warning like the one wich trigger when you put to much systems in expansion bays ?Quote:
Originally Posted by superteddy57
I think some of this is that it isn't explicitly called out in the ship stats (either in CRB for the "base" model or in the AP for the "upgraded" model). Either way, since the actual build costs have changed, the build in a lot of the ships in the AP just aren't "legal" anymore within the budgeted Build Points....and there hasn't been any errata that I am aware of for the APsQuote:
Originally Posted by sciencephile