Official Starfinder RPG Bug Report Thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evolivolution

Vulnerability isn't meant to be used for the Inhibitor feature. It's meant to be used for vulnerabilities, so it is working as intended. No bug here.

---

The bug (or feature request) is in RESIST since we are unable to lower resistance. The originally reported bug not the alternative. Doing something manually is a workaround. In SFRPG, Vulnerability is supposed to be a 50% dmg increase but I think that can be achieved without using VULN as an effect.
Is there a list anywhere of everything that doesn't work for SFPRG ruleset? How can I tell if something is a bug or in feature request category?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superteddy57

This changed recently with an update to the core system. You will need to access the sidebar from the options in the top right and then choose sidebar.

---

Re: Back to the post about DoMW, it ended up being that the Sidebar items were recently moved to Options. Then the bug (or content update) report is that the Reference Manual for DoMW is still giving instructions on using the Library to add Siderbar menus that are no longer there in the Fantasy Grounds > Deck of Many Worlds > Activation Extension.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

Is there a list anywhere of everything that doesn't work for SFPRG ruleset?

---

No, there isn't an updated list of bugs or missing features anywhere. That's something you find in a mature software development studio. SW isn't a mature software development studio...they don't have the staffing or resources for that. Having said that, are you volunteering your time and energy to consolidate and maintain such a list?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

How can I tell if something is a bug or in feature request category?

---

Support for that de-buff should have been included with COM, but it wasn't. It's really a toss-up if this particular instance is a bug or a feature request (I would tend to think of it as a bug), but that only really matters how the developer feels about it as it is new functionality added by COM.

Happy to get involved, two major things I've been working.
1. A Starfinder SRD type module (although someone might already be done or a lot further than I am, I'd be happy to help maintain it once OGL is met)
2. Instructional material on how to automate as much as possible. Similar to the Blahness98's Effect List but in written form. Possibly videos similar stoehovve but focused on SFRPG. This would be the place to call out what can't be done and would need bug fixes or feature requests.

The work on DoMW shows that SW-FGU can achieve nice automation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

The bug (or feature request) is in RESIST since we are unable to lower resistance. The originally reported bug not the alternative. Doing something manually is a workaround. In SFRPG, Vulnerability is supposed to be a 50% dmg increase but I think that can be achieved without using VULN as an effect.

---

I have been creating some robot NPCs in SF with a weakness to electricity. Am I understanding correctly that adding vulnerability to electricity doesn't work if it's added to the Weakness section of the NPC sheet?

Asking because it wasn't working for me as intended. Adding VULN manually as an effect on the combat tracker works alright; I just didn't want to waste time adding a weakness on the NPC sheets that might not be working.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Digodragon

I have been creating some robot NPCs in SF with a weakness to electricity. Am I understanding correctly that adding vulnerability to electricity doesn't work if it's added to the Weakness section of the NPC sheet?

Asking because it wasn't working for me as intended. Adding VULN manually as an effect on the combat tracker works alright; I just didn't want to waste time adding a weakness on the NPC sheets that might not be working.

---

It does work, in theory, but it's very wonky (from my experience). I'd recommend using the Defensive Abilities section of the NPC sheet. "Weaknesses vulnerable to electricity," put this in there along with all the other stuff your NPC has. This also works for most other things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evolivolution

It does work, in theory, but it's very wonky (from my experience). I'd recommend using the Defensive Abilities section of the NPC sheet. "Weaknesses vulnerable to electricity," put this in there along with all the other stuff your NPC has. This also works for most other things.

---

This works well! The 'VULN: cold' effect was added automatically with the Defensive Ability description. The dmg is increased 50% rounded down.
Attachment 45519

In my last session my players could not control the movement of the PC starship token. I have tested this problem with a new clean campaign with the latest updates and no extensions and the only thing the only thing the players can do with the token is double click to open the PC Starship sheet. This is something that needs to be fixed sooner than later.

Do you have the Party Movement and Vision option On?

Regards,
JPG

That does work, thanks!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Moon Wizard

Do you have the Party Movement and Vision option On?

Regards,
JPG

---

I did not have that option turned on. After turning it on my players can now move the token. Thank you! I wish the Starship CT had a warning message to alert GMs that this option needs to be turned on.

It has to do with record ownership. By default, players can only move tokens for records that they "own", and each record can only have one owner. Since no single player can "own" the PC ship sheet, it is considered "unowned". By turning on the Party Movement and Vision option, players can move any friendly token linked from the combat tracker.

We'll add this to our list of things to look at improving for the future.

Regards,
JPG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Moon Wizard

It has to do with record ownership. By default, players can only move tokens for records that they "own", and each record can only have one owner. Since no single player can "own" the PC ship sheet, it is considered "unowned". By turning on the Party Movement and Vision option, players can move any friendly token linked from the combat tracker.

We'll add this to our list of things to look at improving for the future.

Regards,
JPG

---

The issue with this setting is if you have a simultaneous starship and non-starahip combat.

This is more of a website bug but the store page for 'pact worlds' reads that its $35.99 but the bundle price is $44.99

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rathen45

This is more of a website bug but the store page for 'pact worlds' reads that its $35.99 but the bundle price is $44.99

---

I reached out and verified the bottom price is correct and the discount is applied there.

Following my post https://www.fantasygrounds.com/forum...l=1#post585920 concerning ranged damage being impacted by Grappled condition, i found today that the Fatigued condition cause the same issue. I suppose more similar conditions may inappropriately impact damages.

Some additional items found:

* Wonder Grenade effects table is missing as a Table in Armory.
* Inheritor's grace I/II/III heavy armor image link shows as "#wb;image;Inheritors Grace.jpg;Inheritor's Grace" for in Armory.
* Ursikka hide, basic/advanced/elite armor image link opens up with a blank << New Image >> window in AA4 (Players).
* Ursikka hides show up in 'Items > Armor > Armor' instead of 'Items > Armor > Light' section for both AA4s.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

Some additional items found:

* Wonder Grenade effects table is missing as a Table in Armory.
* Inheritor's grace I/II/III heavy armor image link shows as "#wb;image;Inheritors Grace.jpg;Inheritor's Grace" for in Armory.
* Ursikka hide, basic/advanced/elite armor image link opens up with a blank << New Image >> window in AA4 (Players).
* Ursikka hides show up in 'Items > Armor > Armor' instead of 'Items > Armor > Light' section for both AA4s.

---

Confirmed the first 2 bugs...

There are inconsistencies with Gravity Grenades between AA4 and AA4 players modules.
* Gravity grenade II/II entries part " - Eac" in 'Items > Weapons' section. AA4
* Then there is Gravity grenade I/II/III in a "Grenade - " section. AA4P
* Lastly Gravity grenade I in 'Grenade - Grenades' section. AA4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

Some additional items found:

* Wonder Grenade effects table is missing as a Table in Armory.
* Inheritor's grace I/II/III heavy armor image link shows as "#wb;image;Inheritors Grace.jpg;Inheritor's Grace" for in Armory.
* Ursikka hide, basic/advanced/elite armor image link opens up with a blank << New Image >> window in AA4 (Players).
* Ursikka hides show up in 'Items > Armor > Armor' instead of 'Items > Armor > Light' section for both AA4s.

---

Thanks for reporting these. I will get them fixed.
These are fixed. I will get the update pushed out ASAP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

There are inconsistencies with Gravity Grenades between AA4 and AA4 players modules.
* Gravity grenade II/II entries part " - Eac" in 'Items > Weapons' section. AA4
* Then there is Gravity grenade I/II/III in a "Grenade - " section. AA4P
* Lastly Gravity grenade I in 'Grenade - Grenades' section. AA4

---

These are fixed as well.

In the adventure "Skitter Shot" there is a bad link in the pinned notes for the bridge. The note 03.07 7. Bridge (CR3) contains a link to Image: Kenjaro Chidi (Cybernetic Zombie) that is broken. If you click on it you get a window with a blank image. Also, the reference manual entry for it does not include the image at all. The image is included in the assets folder.
Attachment 45811Attachment 45811

In the adventure "Skitter Shot" there is a bad link in the pinned notes for the bridge. The note 03.07 7. Bridge (CR3) contains a link to Image: Kenjaro Chidi (Cybernetic Zombie) that is broken. If you click on it you get a window with a blank image. Also, the reference manual entry for it does not include the image at all. The image is included in the assets folder.
Attachment 45811

Weapon Accessories from Armory do not have any description applied. Ex: Inertial Dampener gives "null" for description on Other tab...

I added these to the list. I will get them fixed.

Support:
This may be a major bug that effects other rulesets, not only SFRPG, that can stop a game in its tracks.

The issue: the NPC token that was clicked and all of the PCs' tokens glitch-out and must be deleted and then re-added via the combat tracker. Everything (the map etc.) goes black for the PCs when this occurs. Note that other NPC tokens, other than the one that was originally clicked, remain in tact and usable (as far as I observed).

To recreate the issue:
1. During a combat encounter, as the GM, set lock tokens to on.
2. As the GM, left-click an NPC (one of the opponents), do not unclick.
3. Attempt to move the NPC. While moving the NPC token, accidently right-click. The map will go black for all PCs and the token of the NPC that was moving becomes glitched. The PCs' tokens also become glitched and will need to be deleted from the map and re-added form the CT.

Please advise.
Thank you.

Addendum: I have not tested this issue in Classic; only in Unity b/c that's were I run games and where I observed the bug.

Thanks for reporting. I've filed a ticket with Carl to look at what is happening. It's a general image control issue.

Regards,
JPG

* Images in the CRB reference image are not showing on 'Reference' screen but spot where image is can be clicked to bring up the image window. ( seen more commonly the lower you go. for example, starting with introduction appears correctly but down into armor upgrade descriptions and further you can't see them anymore)
* Grenade Proficiency missing on Biohacker added to character sheet.
* Not sure how to describe this one, for class abilities selected on Biohacker they don't indent like Core classes abilities.
** Similar to above I saw other rulesets have this indentation feature to place items in backpacks. This would be nice in SFRPG as well.

*Some of the additional races from specific books are added but not others (from the ones I have access to Core, Pact Worlds and some adventure modules have their additional races added but none of the Alien Archives. I could make full list if needed)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

* Images in the CRB reference image are not showing on 'Reference' screen but spot where image is can be clicked to bring up the image window. ( seen more commonly the lower you go. for example, starting with introduction appears correctly but down into armor upgrade descriptions and further you can't see them anymore

---

I will look into the Core Rules Reference Images. And get them fixed. (Found the problem and made the fixes, next week we should see the changes)

Quote:

---

* Grenade Proficiency missing on Biohacker added to character sheet.
* Not sure how to describe this one, for class abilities selected on Biohacker they don't indent like Core classes abilities.

---

Not Sure about these. (I will look and see if this is a module problem)

Quote:

---

** Similar to above I saw other rulesets have this indentation feature to place items in backpacks. This would be nice in SFRPG as well.

---

See the image below. This works in SFRPG. So maybe I am confused.

Quote:

---

*Some of the additional races from specific books are added but not others (from the ones I have access to Core, Pact Worlds and some adventure modules have their additional races added but none of the Alien Archives. I could make full list if needed)

---

Also in the image below, the races are included in the Players Version of the Alien Archives. If there is one that is not in there let me know and I will get it added.

Madman..

Quote:

---

Not Sure about these.

---

Here is a Biohacker4 with Field Dressing added (also noticed Theorem: Paintful Injection is missing within the text of Theorem). Grenade Proficiency missing.
Compared to Envoy4 with Clever Feint and Dispiriting Taunt added. Grenade Proficiency was included.
Attachment 46001
Attachment 46002

Quote:

---

See the image below. This works in SFRPG. So maybe I am confused.

---

Using the picture helped, thanks. I wasn't able to locate the original post I saw when browsing but my starting source is the Starfinder ruleset Atlassian page. My attempts were trying to drag an item onto the backpack instead of using the location field.

Quote:

---

Also in the image below, the races are included in the Players Version of the Alien Archives. If there is one that is not in there let me know and I will get it added.

---

My mistake, I didn't have Players loaded on my test campaign.

I found the reason the Abilities are not indenting.

(As a side note) If you look at any ability there is a text field that contains what it is linked to.

So "Theorem" is the feature for "Field Dressing" so as long as the text is exactly the same (See Image below) it will indent. This text can be changed once it is dropped to the character sheet as well. Allowing you to organize it however you want to do it.

Some things are not going to have this information in the modules, I will get the stuff that needs fixed out as soon as I can.


Madman..

Here is another, an empty new class feature in Dead Suns 2
Attachment 46004

Can you screenshot the link you clicked on to get that to generate please!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by madman

Can you screenshot the link you clicked on to get that to generate please!

---

As requested! It's under Classes > Features
Attachment 46010

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyblix

As requested! It's under Classes > Features
Attachment 46010

---

Hi cyblix,

Sorry about that. Apparently, somewhere at some point, the Starfinder ruleset architecture changed, which took the module out of alignment, at least on how classes and class features are concerned. Change is good but sometimes has unintended consequences. I modified the module to match the new structure and the class features in this adventure will now work once the fix goes into the LIVE system (which is scheduled for next Tuesday, 5/4). I did go back and look at all my other Starfinder modules to make sure there weren't any similar issues and apparently this is the only one I did that had class features added.

Thanks for reporting and enjoy your Starfinder adventures!

-Danny

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Moon Wizard

Thanks for reporting. I've filed a ticket with Carl to look at what is happening. It's a general image control issue.

Regards,
JPG

---

Hi Moon Wizard & Carl,
Has there been an updates on this one? Will there be a fix implemented in the foreseeable future?
Thank you.

@jrock1,

This appears to already be fixed in the beta version that is in testing. The workaround is to be careful with buttons; and close/re-open image if it occurs for now. As soon as the beta version goes Live, it will be addressed.

Regards,
JPG

Hi! When creating a charcter, if you remove a class level it does not remove the BAB, Base Saves and Class Features. One of my players (Soldier 2), accidetnally added a level in Solarian, then deleted it and added the corresponding level in Soldier.

BAB went up with each level, but didn't go down when the level in Solarian was removed. Also, with each level added the saves went up. We could modify the BAB, but not the saves. We had to manually apply penalties to get to the right number.Attachment 46221

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StarMaster

Hi! When creating a charcter, if you remove a class level it does not remove the BAB, Base Saves and Class Features. One of my players (Soldier 2), accidetnally added a level in Solarian, then deleted it and added the corresponding level in Soldier.

BAB went up with each level, but didn't go down when the level in Solarian was removed. Also, with each level added the saves went up. We could modify the BAB, but not the saves. We had to manually apply penalties to get to the right number.Attachment 46221

---

Best bet is to create a new character. I don't believe any of the rulesets allow you to remove a class level.

I know that the starship combat and such is noch 100% polished yet, but i want to mention the issue anyways.

The AC/TL of a starship is 10 + Pilotranks + Armor + Size + Misc. So a ship with a pilot with 3 ranks and armor 3 would have an AC of 16 (10 + 3 + 3). FGu only shows 13 (10 + 0 + 3), so the pilotingranks are not integerated in the calculation.

Hi all! My campaign's crits don't crit!!! I'm starting a SF campaign, (Ultimate License + 4 Demos) and when the PCs score a critical hit, the following damage roll is not rolled as a critical. I'm rolling attacks from the char sheet of one of my players, prior targeting an NPC in the CT. I'm also rolling damage from the char sheet. If I double click the damage field while holding shift, it does roll it as critical and applies the correct effects to the NPC.

Attachment 46263
Attachment 46264

Am I doing something wrong? Or is it a bug?