PDA

View Full Version : Tome of Beast


Granamere
October 22nd, 2020, 21:30
So inside of Fantasy grounds Classic Tomb of Beasts is listed as a Supplement but Tomb of Beasts 2 is a Reference. Why?
LordEntrails
October 22nd, 2020, 21:38
Different Developer? I suggest you post in the bug thread and ask for it to be changed :)
Granamere
October 22nd, 2020, 21:41
I was not sure it was a bug hence why I started here. I can add a post there as well.
LordEntrails
October 22nd, 2020, 23:30
*shrug* not sure its a bug either, but Mr Z is sure to see it there and answer one way or another :)
GavinRuneblade
October 24th, 2020, 19:53
So inside of Fantasy grounds Classic Tomb of Beasts is listed as a Supplement but Tomb of Beasts 2 is a Reference. Why?

I think LordEntrails is correct. The Kobolds probably had two different people do the two books.
Granamere
October 24th, 2020, 20:05
Tome of Beast was converted by Doug Davison
Tome of Beast 2 was converted by Linda Buth
JohnD
October 24th, 2020, 22:11
Changing the category of one or the other of these books is quite a simple thing to accomplish.
rob2e
January 23rd, 2021, 19:13
I did Creature Codex, also Supplement (which is correct).
Neovirtus
January 23rd, 2021, 19:55
I did Creature Codex, also Supplement (which is correct).

... Is that relevant to the current discussion?
rob2e
January 23rd, 2021, 20:00
... Is that relevant to the current discussion?

Not just relevant, but it IS the conversation. It seems to me that you might not be aware that Creature Codex was referred to as Tome of Beasts II until Tome of Beasts II came out. So it's part of the series and made by Kobold Press.
Neovirtus
January 23rd, 2021, 20:37
I am aware, but that's besides the point. If you were just trying to say that Tome of Beasts 2 is the incorrectly classified module, and should be a supplement like Tome of Beasts 1 and Creature Codex, I agree.