Minty23185Fresh
January 15th, 2019, 22:43
I'm sure anyone reading the title to this thread, immediately says to themselves, "This guy is an idiot. He knows nothing about D&D 3.5E!" And you would be mostly correct, I don't know anything about 3.5E.
I am upgrading my Field Filters for All Libraries extension and I am trying to figure out how to sort the AC strings. I am using the 3.5E (Essentials) Monsters Manual as my data source. AC strings typically seem to have this format:
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
I was going to sort left to right, but sometimes the parts in parentheses, are missing the size parameter, or the Dex parameter, or the armor parameter. Sometimes the size and Dex might be in reverse order.
What I am wondering is, do the data items within the parentheses have an order of importance? Would it be better for me to sort first on Dex, then on size? Or visa versa? or maybe on the armor, as with the Gnoll:
15 (+1 natural, +2 leather armor, +2 heavy steel shield), touch 10, flat-footed 15
For these three AC strings:
14 (+1 size, +3 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +1 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
Sorting first by size would yield:
14 (+1 size, +3 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +1 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
But sorting first by Dex, would yield:
14 (+2 size, +1 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+1 size, +3 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
I realize that with a data set of three items, this appears insignificant, by with dozens and dozens of items, it becomes significant.
I am upgrading my Field Filters for All Libraries extension and I am trying to figure out how to sort the AC strings. I am using the 3.5E (Essentials) Monsters Manual as my data source. AC strings typically seem to have this format:
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
I was going to sort left to right, but sometimes the parts in parentheses, are missing the size parameter, or the Dex parameter, or the armor parameter. Sometimes the size and Dex might be in reverse order.
What I am wondering is, do the data items within the parentheses have an order of importance? Would it be better for me to sort first on Dex, then on size? Or visa versa? or maybe on the armor, as with the Gnoll:
15 (+1 natural, +2 leather armor, +2 heavy steel shield), touch 10, flat-footed 15
For these three AC strings:
14 (+1 size, +3 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +1 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
Sorting first by size would yield:
14 (+1 size, +3 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +1 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
But sorting first by Dex, would yield:
14 (+2 size, +1 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+2 size, +2 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
14 (+1 size, +3 Dex, +3 natural), touch 14, flat-footed 12
I realize that with a data set of three items, this appears insignificant, by with dozens and dozens of items, it becomes significant.