Varsuuk
March 26th, 2018, 19:22
Is there a downside to extracting <windowclass> definitions into their own .xml files?
In some cases, I find it easier to remember where a definition is that way plus it would help “clear mental clutter” for me when going to read it so I need not scroll past a lot of other things I am not trying to look at at the moment.
Perhaps this is another example of a non xml guy trying to shoe-horn ruleset creation into his prior C++ style of coding? (I’m one of those one class per for the most part)
Does it use more resources, slow something down, etc? Just not preferred for aesthetic reasons (which I then can ignore since it will be me maintaining this if it ever goes further.)
In some cases, I find it easier to remember where a definition is that way plus it would help “clear mental clutter” for me when going to read it so I need not scroll past a lot of other things I am not trying to look at at the moment.
Perhaps this is another example of a non xml guy trying to shoe-horn ruleset creation into his prior C++ style of coding? (I’m one of those one class per for the most part)
Does it use more resources, slow something down, etc? Just not preferred for aesthetic reasons (which I then can ignore since it will be me maintaining this if it ever goes further.)