Map resolution and rendering

[hereander]

Hi!
I was wondering if FG did any downsampling or rastering to the maps that I load. I found that a map that looks perfectly fine in Irfanview becomes pixelated when displayed and zoomed in FG:

https://i.imgur.com/LKnBRb9.jpg

Edit: Ok, I found out that there was "Resample on Zooming" enabled in Irfanviewe which makes it looking much smoother. So not FG's fault. But I did that experiment in the first place because I find the Maps in the LMoP module to be really Low-Res. Wouldnt it be possible to give it a little better resolution with the next update?

[damned]

The maps are all at 50 or 35px per square. Some of the outdoor squares are 10' as well.
It would be nice if they were all 50px. I try not to use high res images myself to keep load times and memory usage all fast.



https://www.fg-con.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fg-con-6-150-4.jpg (https://www.fg-con.com/events/)
FG Con 6 – April 17-19th 2015 - register at www.fg-con.com (https://www.fg-con.com/) for all the latest info.

[Nylanfs]

Yes, it's advisable to try and keep images below 3mb (for people that have slow upload/download).

[hereander]

Probably they can add some interpolation algorithm to make it look "less digital". Probably not to hard to accomplish, though I do not know anything about the rendering engine that FG uses.
Maybe that thing needs an overhaul anyway, I find the fonts also quite pixel-ish, not so easy on the eyes...