d1wright
July 6th, 2014, 01:19
MODERATOR: Moved to house of healing as this appears to be a support issue.
Just ran across this in a session:
[DAMAGE (M)] Zelda [TYPE: slashing (1d6-1=0)] [MIN DAMAGE] 1-1=0
It looks as though FG recognized minimum damage but it looks like it didn't apply 1 point of nonlethal to the target. How is FG actually handling minimum damage?
Pathfinder handbook
Minimum Damage: If penalties reduce the damage result to less than 1, a hit still deals 1 point of nonlethal damage.
This was seen running v3.05 in a Pathfinder ruleset.
Just ran across this in a session:
[DAMAGE (M)] Zelda [TYPE: slashing (1d6-1=0)] [MIN DAMAGE] 1-1=0
It looks as though FG recognized minimum damage but it looks like it didn't apply 1 point of nonlethal to the target. How is FG actually handling minimum damage?
Pathfinder handbook
Minimum Damage: If penalties reduce the damage result to less than 1, a hit still deals 1 point of nonlethal damage.
This was seen running v3.05 in a Pathfinder ruleset.