SLB
October 16th, 2011, 06:07
Hey,
I was playing with effects, I'm starting to figure them out (I blame the slow uptake on age!).
It seems like the Invisible effect is backwards - my instinct was to set the Invisible effect on the invisible creature, then target those PCs to whom that creature was invisible. However, the way it works is that those who aren't targetted have the miss chance applied, and those who are targetted don't have the miss chance applied (don't have to roll the 50% miss chance).
I can see how this makes sense if, in general, invisible creatures are invisible to the entire party because you just make the creature invisible and you are done. But if, as in my case, there is a party member who can see invisible regularly then it seems backwards.
That said, it's still easier unless you have more characters who see invisible than who don't.
Not sure why I'm mentioning it really ...
I was playing with effects, I'm starting to figure them out (I blame the slow uptake on age!).
It seems like the Invisible effect is backwards - my instinct was to set the Invisible effect on the invisible creature, then target those PCs to whom that creature was invisible. However, the way it works is that those who aren't targetted have the miss chance applied, and those who are targetted don't have the miss chance applied (don't have to roll the 50% miss chance).
I can see how this makes sense if, in general, invisible creatures are invisible to the entire party because you just make the creature invisible and you are done. But if, as in my case, there is a party member who can see invisible regularly then it seems backwards.
That said, it's still easier unless you have more characters who see invisible than who don't.
Not sure why I'm mentioning it really ...