DICE PACKS BUNDLE
Page 2 of 2 First 12

Thread: 4.1 GPU Spike

  1. #11
    Sure, see the attached 4.1 campaign. If you need any further info just ask

    Steps to reproduce:
    - Open the image/map in the campaign (should work with any other too)
    - Enable LoS
    > See drastic increase in GPU usage (even without a single point of LoS) --> LoS in 4.1 seems to hog way more resources than in 4.0.
    - Enable Lighting
    > See an even more drastic increase in GPU usage (even without a single point of Lighting)
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #12
    Does LoS CPU load decrease in return for increased GPU load (4.0 vs. 4.1)?

  3. #13
    pindercarl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    979
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Zarestia View Post
    Sure, see the attached 4.1 campaign. If you need any further info just ask

    Steps to reproduce:
    - Open the image/map in the campaign (should work with any other too)
    - Enable LoS
    > See drastic increase in GPU usage (even without a single point of LoS) --> LoS in 4.1 seems to hog way more resources than in 4.0.
    - Enable Lighting
    > See an even more drastic increase in GPU usage (even without a single point of Lighting)
    Thanks.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Weissrolf View Post
    Does LoS CPU load decrease in return for increased GPU load (4.0 vs. 4.1)?
    Just tested on a Curse of Strahd Module Map. Token Movement with only LoS seems to be a bit more smooth but still going 100% CPU Core/Thread if you hold down an arrow key for fast movement.
    I think this was mentioned several times in other places and I want don't want to start another discussions in this thread but having HWMonitor the whole time open I can say most performance hiccups ('slow' initial campaign loading, several seconds loading when opening things in the asset menu, etc.) correlate with a 99%-100% utilazation of one CPU Thread. I know multi-threading is not the easiest part of programming, but I think there could be huge gains in responsiveness and performance. Just my 2 cents.

    If someone wants anything further tested, just tell me
    Last edited by Zarestia; March 16th, 2021 at 17:39. Reason: word

  5. #15
    4.0 - No LoS, no lighting:
    4.1 - No LoS, no lighting:

    4.0 - LoS, no lighting:
    4.1 - LoS, no lighting:

    4.1 LoS calculation seems to use considerably more GPU processing compared to 4.0, while CPU load seems about the same.

    This is a comparison of the same map (imported campaign from 4.0 to 4.1), just one PC token, no NPC tokens, no movement on the map (just display). Nvidia RTX 2070 Super, power-saving disabled (fixed clock-rate).
    Last edited by Weissrolf; March 17th, 2021 at 16:12.

  6. #16
    Please note that for the issue reported by Zarestia in post #3 along with the data provided in post #11; @cpinder made some adjustments to the lighting blur calculations to improve performance in the most recent build pushed today.

    Regards,
    JPG

  7. #17
    That improved GPU load considerably. Maybe slightly higher CPU load, though?

    No LoS, no lighting:


    LoS, no lighting:


    LoS, lighting:

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
5E Character Create Playlist

Log in

Log in