-
April 2nd, 2018, 20:50 #31
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 54
-
April 2nd, 2018, 21:03 #32
Cool let me get a draft outline of the framework done and I can send a copy your way. Then you can determine which parts of the framework you are interested in creating content about. The goal for sure is to allow this to be a potential community development with different authors adding ideas about Waterdeep.
DMs Guild Products: Waterdeep primer, Waterdeep Fantasy Grounds Module
Current GM Games: DnD 5E Forgotten Realms, DnD 5E Tal'Dorei
Current Projects: Waterdeep Battlemaps
Systems of Interest: DnD 5E, 7th Sea
Random Musing: https://www.jasonhardin.com
-
April 2nd, 2018, 22:50 #33
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 54
-
April 8th, 2018, 22:54 #34
- Join Date
- Dec 2016
- Posts
- 32
For me, I'm looking for the area around the Adventurer's Quarter to be enhanced.
-
April 25th, 2018, 15:57 #35
MenzelG. I will look into that. I actually am not sure what that area is of Waterdeep, so if you have any references I can read about it in that would be useful.
DMs Guild Products: Waterdeep primer, Waterdeep Fantasy Grounds Module
Current GM Games: DnD 5E Forgotten Realms, DnD 5E Tal'Dorei
Current Projects: Waterdeep Battlemaps
Systems of Interest: DnD 5E, 7th Sea
Random Musing: https://www.jasonhardin.com
-
April 27th, 2018, 04:15 #36
I'm looking for a map of the city with pins in nearly every building so you can easily click on any location the PCs visit. We could flesh out each location from existing published materials, make some new ones up to fill the gaps, and just include the name and tiny bit of info on those locations which aren't as heavily detailed. I would think this would really be the foundation you need before starting anything else in Waterdeep. To get the ball rolling you really have to just "open the gates" and let the PCs explore. After that we'd all be encouraged and inspired to look up and start xferring content to a new mod. The question is- how would such a large group work in tandem without things getting too fouled up- especially when working on a mod. Perhaps FG needs a new setting where everyone can log in just like you would if you were a player but everyone gets GM/DM access to everything so multiple people can edit at once on the same campaign.
-
April 27th, 2018, 05:00 #37
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 54
So that's kinda the idea i had, on a full continent scale, but i think id need to pitch it to WOTC which could then be seamlessly provided to A) a website and B) any VTT. They could really set this up using a Rest API and we could just code, within the modules, to remotely pull the information dynamically from them. This would enable a living world where, as events happen the responses returned from the API could be changed, so... example if we were playing in the time of the Netherese for example. One day our API calls and we get results of the locations of all the Flying Enclaves, the next day Karsus had cast his Avatar and they've now all fallen, so the API returns results of where some of them crashed some just return a message that the enclave can no longer be found.
WOTC could charge a monthly subscription for this (which id happily pay, i mean they're still a business so they need to be able to make money, i get it) users could log into the WOTC website for it and use the map and NPC functions of this, but they could also enable sites or software like, Twitch, Fantasy Grounds, and THAT OTHER VTT. Users would log into the portal of their choice which would have an associated WOTC account and each would have an oAuth token to grant them access. You could then just click on a map within Fantasy Grounds and the application would send the API call to WOTC and retrieve the live response from WOTC about what's there now.
Yah i know, maybe a pipe dream and at very least years down the line, but would be super cool.
-
April 27th, 2018, 06:05 #38
You could do Waterdeep with multiple others in a couple of ways. First though you would need a map. That map image would have to be sacrosanct since all the pin locations are going to be defined by pixel coordinates on that image.
From there you could go a couple of ways.
A) That master map could include a master story pin for each location. Then you could divide up or claim certain pins to work on. Maybe by district, pin number or something. Since the story IDs would be set, they could be renamed and cut and paste used to update the db.xml file to one master with everything included.
B) Just divide up up the map (perhaps by district) and let each author create the pins and story entries as desired. When cutting and pasting into the master db.xml, you would have to account for renumbering object IDs (which would be necessary for all other object types with method A or B).
c) Divide Waterdeep up into separate modules by author, probably by district. Then each part would stand-alone and could be released individually etc.
I'm big on setting out standards on such projects. I would recommend a story template be created for everyone to use that sets out a format for each location/story entry. Determine some sort of recommendation for encounters, battle maps, NPC CR's (like approximate CR distributions), treasure/wealth.
I would also suggest you talk to Dulux about getting a license to use his DOE Locations extension. It would add an incredible amount of detail and capability.
I think I've said elsewhere that I think the September product from WotC will be a Waterdeep module. If you are able to put together something of good quality that is complete (something WotC can't do in a published book), and put it up on the DMsGuild at the same time or earlier, you will have a very large following
Problems? See; How to Report Issues, Bugs & Problems
On Licensing & Distributing Community Content
Community Contributions: Gemstones, 5E Quick Ref Decal, Adventure Module Creation, Dungeon Trinkets, Balance Disturbed, Dungeon Room Descriptions
Note, I am not a SmiteWorks employee or representative, I'm just a user like you.
-
April 27th, 2018, 08:56 #39
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 54
My vote would be to do either A or B. If i'm running a Waterdeep campaign switching between modules isnt something id want to have to do.
But that said, if the September product IS indeed waterdeep id be concerned that if we put material together, it would be incorrect. Its been what... 100ish DR years since the last documented anything we have of waterdeep??
Regardless, im down to work on this in either A or B format if we can agree on module formatting/templates etc and are using previously published materials from 1st, 2nd and 3rd eds
-
April 27th, 2018, 12:35 #40
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 54
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks