Thread: 5e Bug Reports (Part 3)
-
October 4th, 2017, 01:07 #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Posts
- 547
Tomb of Annihilation
Boar
The description of the Charge and Relentless traits are different than the Monster Manual.
-
October 4th, 2017, 02:04 #12
@astromath. What is the Monster Manual - Creatures?
If there is something that you would like to see in Fantasy Grounds that isn't currently part of the software or if there is something you think would improve a ruleset then add your idea here https://www.fantasygrounds.com/featu...rerequests.php
-
October 4th, 2017, 02:10 #13
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Posts
- 547
Here are screenshots of each module.
Monster Manuals.jpg
-
October 4th, 2017, 02:14 #14
Your screenshot is showing a group called monster manual - creatures. I need to know which module that group is in. It is an adventure module I think.
If there is something that you would like to see in Fantasy Grounds that isn't currently part of the software or if there is something you think would improve a ruleset then add your idea here https://www.fantasygrounds.com/featu...rerequests.php
-
October 4th, 2017, 02:23 #15
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Posts
- 547
I just narrowed it down. It is from Out of the Abyss. It has two creature listings: One is the Monster Manual - Creatures, and the other is Out of the Abyss - Creatures.
-
October 4th, 2017, 19:11 #16
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
- Location
- Switzerland
- Posts
- 20
I don't know if this has been reported before but adding the War Domain to a new character should give the proficiency with martian weapons and heavy armor. It does add the feature Bonus Proficiencies (War) but it does not add them to the proficiencies section of the character sheet.
Edit: I used the War Domain from the PHB ModuleLast edited by lasmela; October 4th, 2017 at 19:12. Reason: adding the module
-
October 4th, 2017, 22:02 #17If there is something that you would like to see in Fantasy Grounds that isn't currently part of the software or if there is something you think would improve a ruleset then add your idea here https://www.fantasygrounds.com/featu...rerequests.php
-
October 5th, 2017, 04:09 #18
Don't know that I would call it an "error" per se, but are we happy with the unconscious condition being automatically assigned to NPCs? I mean for PCs, it's great, but in 5E, NPCs are dead, not unconscious, and (to me) it's VERY ANNOYING to have the unconscious condition applied to NPCs. Anyone?
rob2e - Join me on Discord!
Become a Patron!
Follow me on the Twitters
Come watch the Twitches... twitch.tv/rob2e
Also my YouTube Channel
Available on the FORGE
My Dungeon Master's Guild Material
-
October 5th, 2017, 04:23 #19
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Posts
- 547
It says in the PH or the DMG (I forget which), if the DM determines that the NPC is important enough for the scenario, s/he gets to decide if that NPC is unconscious or dead.
Can anybody back me up on that? Thx.
-
October 5th, 2017, 04:26 #20
I think that IS true because you CAN do non-lethal damage. But I would like to see FG either have the OPTION to apply unconscious or to NOT do it AUTOMATICALLY on NPCs. MY (personal) reason is that I use sounds and every time someone goes to zero HP we gotta hear that fakakta sound. It's cool when it happens to PCs, but not NPCs. I just didn't like that FG FORCED this new condition on us. I'd rather it be an option.
No?rob2e - Join me on Discord!
Become a Patron!
Follow me on the Twitters
Come watch the Twitches... twitch.tv/rob2e
Also my YouTube Channel
Available on the FORGE
My Dungeon Master's Guild Material
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks