Thread: RQ2 ruleset
-
October 28th, 2014, 22:29 #21
I haven't done any work on this project in a long time. At this point it would pretty much be a complete restart due to the big changes in FG since I worked on it. I don't know that I'd do a BRP extension anymore, I think I'd probably do it as a CoreRPG based Ruleset.
Full License Operator - You must have a 'Lite' License to play in my games.
Member and GM in the Fantasy Grounds Pathfinder Society Group.
PFS Fantasy Grounds Forum
FG Community Teamspeak Server: ts.fg-con.com
Interested in Custom Character Portraits and Tokens? Contact me.
-
October 29th, 2014, 02:22 #22
You might be interested to see Legend is on sale at rpgnow for $1.
https://www.rpgnow.com/product/97239/Legend
-
October 29th, 2014, 02:22 #23
Yeah... t would be better value as a CoreRPG extension but that is a whole new project
-
October 29th, 2014, 19:23 #24
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- B.C., Canada
- Posts
- 387
Actually is has always been on sale for $1. I think that was their marketing strategy from the start. Core rules are cheap and the add ons are where they might make some money.
It would be nice if we could get a solid d100 core based ruleset that could be modified/adapted to the various incarnations of BRP/RQ/OQ etc. I wonder if the new CoC ruleset would be the place to start.
-
June 13th, 2015, 16:29 #25
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 157
I've been very busy with other things for the last couple of years but i'm back and looking at this again. Personally, I would prefer for the BRP system to be updated, as we have been waiting for quite a long time for that to happen.
-
June 14th, 2015, 17:11 #26
There isn't currently an active developer for the BRP ruleset. If you're interested in updating the BRP ruleset, there is some info here: https://www.fantasygrounds.com/forum...ission-work%29 and contact ddavison to see if they're still looking and what expected.
Private Messages: My inbox is forever filling up with PMs. Please don't send me PMs unless they are actually private/personal messages. General FG questions should be asked in the forums - don't be afraid, the FG community don't bite and you're giving everyone the chance to respond and learn!
-
June 14th, 2015, 23:06 #27
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 157
On that post it says that they want to port functionality from BRP into older rulesets.
-
June 14th, 2015, 23:26 #28
It's an old post, but the concepts and details would be the same for updating the BRP ruleset, which is now classed as an older ruleset. Basically, to the best of my knowledge, there isn't a current developer for the BRP ruleset and it doesn't look like anyone is stepping up to do it. If you'd be interested then reach out to ddavison.
Private Messages: My inbox is forever filling up with PMs. Please don't send me PMs unless they are actually private/personal messages. General FG questions should be asked in the forums - don't be afraid, the FG community don't bite and you're giving everyone the chance to respond and learn!
-
June 15th, 2015, 07:44 #29
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 157
I suppose I could, however my time is very limited to spend, and I'm quite out of practice on the coding side so I'm not sure I could do it justice. I'll have a word anyway too see what is expected.
-
June 15th, 2015, 10:14 #30
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks