It’s not that options are bad; they just introduce code and UI complexity, so should be planned.
An extension can query what ruleset its opened in to behave differently. Dulux-Oz does this quite a bit in his DOE extensions.
Regards,
JPG
Printable View
It’s not that options are bad; they just introduce code and UI complexity, so should be planned.
An extension can query what ruleset its opened in to behave differently. Dulux-Oz does this quite a bit in his DOE extensions.
Regards,
JPG
Sorry, that was of a joke tho probably not well thought out I guess.
Valyar try this for now. Look in settings with this one.
I'll look at capturing the ruleset tag like Moon suggested and setting it based on that. Will be easier and less for someone to deal with but I don't own your ruleset and not sure what it's tags are at the moment. It's also 3:30am here and I need to go to bed ;)
I have to be the straight guy on the forums. ;)
Thanks,
JPG
THIS IS FANTASTIC, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!! (caps intended, I am ecstatic).
Quick question, after I did some testing and compared my work with the D&D 5e Reference manual:
Is there a way to avoid having article with the same name as the sub-chapter? In 5e somehow it is done. I don't want to have duplicates (the highlighted items) as in the attached picture. Can't think of workaround at the moment, had long flights and mind is broken.
It is perfect now! (a tear is shed)
What governs the font color of the sections?
Got it! I will check with Paul if we can do something about it. :)
Update 3.3:
Added: campaign setting for text color settings (for use with dark themes so you can see).
Updated: sub-chapters that are empty story entries will now only create a sub-chapter entry w/o the story.
Thank you celestian, superb job good sir!